Innocent
Are we innocent until proven guilty? Criminal law states that we are. It is a fine feature of our justice system. It accounts for human error, witness confusion, look-alikes and bad alibis. It protects those falsely accused from undeserved punishment.
We’ve all been accused of something at some time in our lives. A suspicious spouse, a biased teacher, an angry friend, convinced we committed an offense, makes an accusation. Does that make us guilty? Not necessarily. Yet, we may suffer days, weeks or months of ill treatment until we can prove our innocence. Sometimes, we can’t prove it at all and the stigma glues itself to our skin until the stench of it stays imbedded in our nose-hairs.
While we are at the mercy of our accusers in our private lives, public law gives us a chance to defend ourselves. That is…unless we are accused of having connections with Al Quaeda. In that case, we might be faced with inhumane treatment and without access to any legal support. Because, in that case, we are presumed guilty until proven innocent.
Take the case of Maher Arar, who is filing a law suit against US officials for his months of detention and torture on Syrian soil, despite lack of evidence of any connection between him and Al Quaeda. Despite inhumane treatment, Mr Arar was eventually pronounced innocent of any terrorist ties, but nothing can reverse the atrocities that were committed against him during his detention.
A new law gives the president of the United States a free hand in selecting the methods used to question persons suspected of Al Quaeda connections. Perhaps you don’t mind knowing that our government uses unconventional methods to deal with terrorists. But what about the innocents? Are we then entitled to commit injustice? Are we free from accountability?
The president decides how to treat suspects, whether or not there is evidence against them and there are few restrictions on his decision. Does that not put all of us in jeopardy? What checks and balances remain in place to prevent those in power from eliminating “uncomfortable” political opponents? Once they are accused of being terrorist-friendly what protects those whose voices represent the dissident masses?
The Republican majority strong-armed the senate into approving the new law. You and I have no say in the matter. But you and I decide who makes up the next senate and house.
November is not far away!

